Test Setup

Processor Intel i7-3960X (6C/12T, 3.3 GHz)
Intel i7-3930K (6C/12T, 3.2 GHz)
Motherboards ASUS Rampage IV Gene
ASUS Rampage IV Formula
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Intel All-In-One Liquid Cooler
Corsair H-100 with Delta Fans (Overclocking)
Power Supply OCZ 1250W Gold ZX Series
Memory GSkill RipjawsZ 4x4 GB DDR3-2400 9-11-11 Kit 1.65 V
Memory Settings XMP
Video Cards ASUS 7970 3GB GDDR5
ECS GTX 580 1536MB
Video Drivers Catalyst 12.3
NVIDIA Drivers 296.10
Hard Drive Corsair Force GT 60GB
Micron RealSSD C300 256GB
Case Open Test Bed - CoolerMaster Lab V1.0
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit
SATA Testing Micron RealSSD C300 256GB
USB 2/3 Testing OCZ Vertex3 240GB

Many thanks to...

Despite this being a critical analysis of the ASUS high end products, I must give thanks to ASUS for their time in answering my questions, as well as providing some of the hardware in order to showcase their products.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system as a whole with a wall meter connected to the OCZ 1250W power supply, while in a dual 7970 GPU configuration.  This power supply is Gold rated, and as I am in the UK on a 230-240 V supply, leads to ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, which is suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading.  This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency.  These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

Power Consumption - Idle

Power Consumption - Metro 2033

Power Consumption - OCCT

As expected, the X79 systems draw significantly more power than any of the Z77 systems we have tested on our recent testbed update.  What could perhaps be surprising is the 140W difference during an OCCT test.  Part of this difference will be a change in PSU efficiency, but even if that knocks it back to 100W difference, that is a lot between what is a 77W processor and a 135 W processor (58W difference).  This would suggest that the power delivery also plays a part in the power usage of the motherboards at load, significantly more so for the X79 platform.

It should also be noted that the ROG boards are tailored by default to be more beneficial for overclocking by invoking a manual voltage rather than an offset.  This has repercussions for power consumption, especially when overclocked - if the settings are adjusted to offset VIDs, power consumption should reduce (in comparison to manually setting the voltages).

POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized.  A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized).  As part of our testing, we are now going to look at the POST Boot Time - this is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)  These results are subject to human error, so please allow +/- 1 second in these results.

POST (Power-On Self-Test) Time

As expected, the boot times for ROG boards are on the higher end, especially compared to Z77.  A large part of this is the internal system management ASUS use in the BIOS, to ensure that all the onboard sensors are appropriately initialized, a well as all Auto BIOS settings are configured properly.  On the Formula and Extreme, disabling features such as Audio and NICs in our stripped timings removes a good couple of seconds apiece.

Overclocks

Here at AnandTech we want to provide quick and easy ways to determine if a board is good for you (with in-depth analysis of course).  So here is a quick round up of our overclocking results.  Overclocks are tested for stability with PovRay and OCCT - while these may not be the most strenuous of stability tests, it does offer a quick check for memory errors under high load (and also balances testing time with getting the next board on for review!).

Gene: 50x @ 1.500 V, default LLC, shows 1.456 V at load, 80C PovRay, 83C OCCT
Formula: 50x @ 1.550 V, default LLC, shows 1.520 V at load, 83C PovRay, 85C OCCT
Extreme: 50x @ 1.500 V, default LLC, shows 1.456 V at load, 81C PovRay, 84C OCCT

The limiting factor with our ROG overclocks seemed to be the temperature of either the CPU or the VRMs.  Anything above 87 degrees Celsius on the CPU caused the processor to reduce the multiplier in order to ensure that parts of the motherboard were not damaged.  So we can safely say that performance in the ROG products is there for any advanced water cooling system you will have at hand.

Competitive Overclocking on the Extreme System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • jontech - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    But sounds kind of cool,.

    Helps that Asus makes it :)
  • Paulman - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    Asus Republic of Gamers also holds Starcraft tournaments, as well! That's how I first heard of their brand. In fact, the ASUS ROG Starcraft II Summer 2012 tournament is on right now and I'm watching a game vs. EG.IdrA and EG.Puma (same team, but one American teammate versus a Korean teammate).

    For more info on this tourney, see: http://rog.asus.com/142982012/gaming/join-the-rog-...
  • primeval - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    A fun tournament thus far.

    For the branding portion of this article, I highly recommend checking out some of ASUS ROG's commercials. They have been playing throughout the aforementioned tournament and I have to say they are probably the best hardware commercials I have ever seen in terms of production quality. I think that if you see a few of those commercials, you may be able to further rationalize the branding award.
  • Meaker10 - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    1x/16x/8x/16x would kill any dual card setup in a micro atx case, kinda defeating the point....
  • just4U - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    the 8x slot is rather pointless...
  • danjw - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    I would rather see an article on the Ivybridge ROG motherboards then the Sandybridge-E ones. These are very niche boards, though I guess that is only slightly less true of the Ivybridge boards. For heavily threaded and memory intensive applications Sandybridge-E will win. But not really on much else, though they are chosen by some just because they are the most expensive.
  • StevoLincolnite - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    Also, Sandy Bridge overclocks higher and throws out less heat, because of the silly design choice that Intel made in regards to the heat spreader compound.

    Not a problem for those who are up to the task of removing the IHS or lapping.
    Sad part is that Ivy Bridge actually has nice thermals and power consumption at stock; which could have translated well for enthusiasts.

    IvyBridge-E should be out within the next year, haswell will get released and the cycle shall continue.
    Hopefully we get 8 core Ivybridge-E chips, which is severely lacking on the Socket 2011 platform with the 3930K's being die harvested 8 core chips, plus most socket 2011 motherboards will take an Ivybridge-e chip anyway, when they're released.
  • danjw - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    I was just looking at "leaked" slide that shows Ivy Bridge-E out in Q3 2013 and Haswell out in Q2 2013. I really don't see what the point is of an Ivy Bridge-E if Haswell beats it to the market. With Sandy Bridge-E they released it before the Ivy Bridge tock. I just don't see why that would make much sense.
  • Assimilator87 - Saturday, August 4, 2012 - link

    Haswell will probably be limited to four cores, whereas Ivy Bridge-E will scale up to ten cores.
  • mapesdhs - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    I was hunting for R4E refs and found this. It's strange reading what people expected was going to happen back when the R4E was new. IB-E with 10 cores eh? Oh well. Mind you, that did happen with IB-EP, and infact the XEON E5-2680 v2 is one of the best upgrades one can do for an X79 mbd, at least for threaded performance anyway. Hard to avoid wondering how things would have panned out if the 3930K had simply been a fully functional 8-core in the first place, instead of the crippled sampled chip consumers were offered. However, I obtained quite a few, and they still work pretty well, especially with so many PCIe lanes to play with, and it's cool being able to use a 950 Pro to boot from NVMe (comes with its own boot ROM), though the ROG forum does have a thread with custom BIOS profiles available to add native NVMe boot support to various ASUS mbds.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now