Integrated Graphics Performance Comparison (continued)

Far Cry 1.2 Performance

Offering twice the performance of the GMA 900, the Radeon Xpress 200 actually makes Far Cry playable. If you turn the quality settings down even further the game becomes even more playable, but at the expense of making it look like one big aliased blur.

Far Cry 1.2 Integrated Graphics Performance


The Sims 2 Performance

In our GeForce 6200 review we found that Intel's GMA 900 actually performed pretty well under The Sims 2, which is the type of title where good performance really matters for an integrated graphics solution.

To our surprise, ATI's Radeon Xpress 200 wasn't able to outperform the GMA 900 at all. The Radeon Xpress 200 can run at slightly better image quality settings than the best the GMA 900 can do, but overall the advantage isn't too impressive.

The Sims 2 Integrated Graphics Performance

Battlefield Vietnam Performance

The Radeon Xpress 200 is quite playable under Battlefield Vietnam, especially at lower resolutions. The GMA 900 numbers are good for comparison, but keep in mind that the Radeon Xpress 200 is running here at better image quality settings.

Battlefield: Vietnam Integrated Graphics Performance


Warcraft III Performance

Surprisingly enough, in Warcraft III we actually saw higher performance from the Radeon Xpress 200 than the bandwidth limited Radeon X300 SE.

Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Integrated Graphics Performance


Integrated Graphics Performance Comparison Integrated Graphics Performance: Conclusion
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • kogase - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    Eh... I don't think the boards are kicking Intel's ass. A64 is.
  • fuzzynavel - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    I didn't realise that the nforce4 and ATI mobos...kicked intels ass so badly!! Not bad for a first attempt....just avoid the integrated graphics and it all looks sweet
  • Denial - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    This is nice and all, but I'm not uprading until dual cores are out. The difference between my home PC (P4 2.8) and office workstation (dual 2.66 xeons) is night and day. It's at the point that my home PC drives me nuts when one process brings everything else to a halt (all the more frustrating when it's something like explorer running amok). I've absolutely had it with single CPU's, no more!
  • VaultDweller - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    The tables on pages 10 and 11 both list Halo as the first benchmark, but the review text on page 10 refers to a 14.4% gain in 'Quake 3.' According to the table, that 14.4% was for Halo.
  • MAME - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    sweet

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now